Can food manufacturers improve nutritional standards for children?

Infant nutrition has been in the spotlight, with negative stories in the media often exaggerating the positive. Earlier this year, another Nestlé baby food scandal came to light, while concerns about the ultra-processing of infant formula continue to grow. However, the focus is now shifting to the nutritional value of infant formula, which critics claim is seriously lacking.

“Malnutrition is a universal problem that holds back development with devastating consequences for entire nations. It has a devastating impact on children – dulling their brains, reducing productivity and perpetuating poverty,” a UNICEF spokesperson said. “UNICEF and the European Union are committed to scaling up and sustaining our efforts to reach more children.”

However, UNICEF also notes that child nutrition is low on the agenda in most European countries and that resources are lacking.

A report published by The Food Foundation in the UK revealed a significant decline in child health, stating that “children in England are now smaller and more likely to be obese and have type 2 diabetes”. This has led to campaigners including celebrity chef Jamie Oliver, politician Gordon Brown and public health professor Michael Marmot joining The Food Foundation in calling on Britain’s new Labour government to urgently address the decline in child health.

Why then is the health of European children so poor? And is children’s food so nutritious?

Is there insufficient nutritional value in infant nutrition?

Although many consumers accuse manufacturers of skimping on nutrients, the industry strongly denies such claims.

Leave a Comment