Yet more evidence for a hypothetical perk planet lurking in the most remote corners of us solar system has come to light – and the clues are linked to icy bodies crossing the planet’s orbit Neptune as you traverse long, winding paths the sun.
Planet Nineas the predicted planet is called, was first postulated in 2016 by Konstantin Batygin and Michael Brown of Caltech, the latter also dwarf planet There is in 2005. Their original evidence focused primarily on the clustering of trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), objects that spend most of their orbits farther from the Sun than Neptune. That is rather far. More specifically, the duo had zoomed in on TNOs with high inclinations, meaning the objects orbited the sun at steep angles to the ecliptic plane.
Because the contents of the solar system are formed from a disk around the sun, we would expect the orbits of anything orbiting the sun to remain relatively close to the plane of that disk. However, some don’t – and the team deduces this as evidence that Planet Nine’s gravity could pull the objects out of the ecliptic and bunch them together into highly inclined orbits that share similar “apsides” (the closest and most distant points in their orbits around the Sun) and are oriented away from the ecliptic at a similar tilt.
Related: Evidence for ‘Planet 9’ could actually prove that our theory of gravity is incomplete
However, some astronomers remained skeptical, arguing that what Batygin and Brown saw as clustering was merely a clustering illusion caused by observational bias. The Caltech duo disputes this and has now published a paper that focuses mainly on observations of low-inclination TNOs that don’t cluster, but still have quirks.
These frigid TNOs are strange because they spend most of their lives hundreds of times farther from the sun than Soil is, but their orbits are so elongated that they dip inwards and spend a short time closer to the Sun than Neptune, which is only 30 times further from the Sun than Earth. “With this work, we looked at objects with longer-period orbits but that also interact strongly with Neptune, especially objects that cross Neptune’s orbit,” Batygin said. Space.com.
To be clear, this does not include every object that crosses Neptune’s orbit. Pluto is a good counterexample. Like Pluto, the majority of TNOs do not have orbits as elongated as those included in the team’s new study. On the contrary, most TNOs have trajectories that keep them relatively close enough to Neptune for extended periods of time time such that they can be controlled by the ice giant’s gravity.
However, the team was only concerned with the TNOs, which receive hundreds of them astronomical units away from Neptune’s gravitational tides, where Planet Nine can influence it – if it exists, of course. Because these studied objects come close to the ecliptic plane from all directions, without showing any clustering behavior, the same claim of bias made on previous evidence regarding high inclination, clustering of TNOs does not hold.
The TNOs studied, and all other TNOs on similar paths, do not spend too much time in their jobs; over millions of years, the gravity of the azure ice giant Neptune inevitably destroys them, scattering them far and wide and sometimes out of the solar system altogether. This means that whatever sends TNOs into Neptune-crossing orbits does so continuously. There must be a continuous process to keep TNO’s offering supplemented. This means that the culprit cannot be something that happened in the distant past, such as a star passing particularly close. It must be something that still exists.
There are two scenarios where TNOs regularly find themselves in long, looping orbits that cross Neptune’s path. One scenario is that of the galactic tide, which is the gravitational force of the tides galaxy all around us, acting on objects within the Oort cloud, which lies far beyond Neptune. These objects only moderately feel the Sun’s gravity due to their distance from our host star, but the galactic tide can bring them closer to Neptune.
The other scenario – perhaps the more interesting one – is that Planet Nine’s gravity disturbs these Oort Cloud objects in such a way that they move closer to Neptune over time.
Batygin and his team – Michael Brown, Alessandro Morbidelli of the Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur in Nice, France, and David Nesvorny of the South-west Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado – conducted two sets of simulations using observational data from real , low-inclination TNOs crossing Neptune, to discover which scenario is more accurate.
One simulation involved a planet with a mass five times that of Earth, which influenced the TNOs (the simulated properties they used for Planet Nine were derived from the features that best explained previous evidence, such as the clustering of the TNOs with high inclination), while the other simulation simulation had no Planet Nine at all and only modeled the galactic tide. Who would be most adept at getting TNOs past Neptune?
The simulations showed that low-inclination TNOs can only regularly enter Neptune’s orbit if Planet Nine is indeed there to hurl them. By themselves, the vortices of the galactic tides were considered too weak to move TNOs past Neptune. So in the galactic tidal simulation the TNOs come within a certain distance of the sun and no closer – but in the Planet Nine scenario the TNOs are spread out over a series of Neptune-crossing orbits, which matches what we see in reality. .
“We show that you can reject the scenario in which all this happens because of the galactic tides with an astonishing degree of statistical significance,” Batygin said. “Conversely, the Planet Nine scenario is perfectly compatible with the data.”
Batygin compares it to a football match, where Neptunus is the goalkeeper. The Galactic Tides can shoot the TNOs towards the goal, but not with enough force to get them past the goalkeeper. Planet Nine, on the other hand, is like a planetary Harry Kane, regularly blasting the TNOs past Neptune with finesse.
“What we see in the data is a number of footballs in the goal,” Batygin said.
Yet the hunt for the footballer continues.
Related stories:
– Could an ‘Earth-like’ planet be hiding in the outer reaches of our solar system?
— The elusive Planet 9 could be surrounded by hot moons, and that’s how we would find it
– Renowned string theorist proposes new way to hunt our solar system’s mysterious ‘Planet 9’
Later this decade the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile will open and begin conducting nighttime surveys of the entire sky with its 8.4-meter telescope mirror. It will be able to test the evidence available to date for Planet Nine: the clustering of the orbits, the alignment of their orbital planes, their steep orbital inclinations, and the prevalence of retrograde (backward orbit) Centaurs. These refer to icy bodies that entered from the Oort Cloud and are currently orbiting among the solar system’s outer planets. If any of these illusions stem from observational biases, then the Vera Rubin observations will show that this is the case. Conversely, it could strengthen the evidence and find many more TNOs showing the same potential influences from Planet Nine.
“It will test all these gravity lines of evidence with an independent new investigation that is not subject to the same biases as the previous one,” Batygin said.
It’s even possible that the Vera Rubin Observatory will go all out and actually find the great tamale.
“Thanks to its efficiency, maybe – just maybe – it will find Planet Nine,” Batygin said. “That would be pretty cool.”
The new results have been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters and are currently available as pre-printing.